emi wrote:
Grazie ne ho proprio bisogno........infatti non ne ho mai provata una .....e non ho idea su come vada portata ........
Ma è veramente difficile andarci ....visto che è cosi' stretta ?????
No, no ... è piu' "facile" ... anche divertirsi ... devi solo gestire il peso longitudinalmente ed andare sulla lamina inclinando, busto frontale ... la tavola fa tutto da sola ... il cambio lamina è piu' rapido data la ridotta larghezza ...
L'unica cosa è che con angolazioni alte ed una base d'appoggio stretta si tende ad avere meno equilibrio ed eventuale lavoro di sliding è piu' compromesso.
Ecco le differenze tra i settaggi:
- Lower angles give you the following:
You use more pressure in your ankles to turn, making toe side turns somewhat easier.
Along with a wider board, lower binding angles make it easier to balance the board, with more fore/aft and rotational mobility.
You get more stability.
For the same width board, you can change edges quicker with lower binding angles, because you use small joints near the board (the ankle). That is why slalom racers want to use the lowest angles possible. However, when comparing the quickness of edge changes among boards of different width, the width takes over as the determining factor, with narrow boards quicker edge-to-edge.
- Higher angles give you the following:
You use more pressure in your shins to turn, making heel side turns somewhat easier.
Along with a narrow board, higher binding angles make it more difficult to balance the board
You get less fore/aft and rotational mobility.
High angles also result in more lateral flexing, which is what hard boots were designed for.
For the same width board, you will change edges slower with higher binding angles, because you use large joints, far away from the board (knees and hips) in order to complete the edge change. However, when comparing the quickness of edge changes among boards of different width, the width takes over as the determining factor, with narrow boards quicker edge-to-edge.
