Reverse Spring on Northwave Boots
Moderators: fivat, rilliet, Arnaud, nils
Reverse Spring on Northwave Boots
Check this out: on my point 990 the owner (who currently works at northwave in Italy) has modified the spring system reversing the springs in the back boot...what do you think?
- Attachments
-
- nw990.jpg (34.62 KiB) Viewed 6005 times
Francesco Swoard (1G175M 3G175M020 e 168H054),Wingergun205,Shaman193,TTubeS1/174GS,F2 (RS183'08 e'06/Lancelot/Slbpfl),Virus (Hurric./Dragon),Pogo (Hardc./Imp.),Burton (FP/Speed/PJ/CustomX),WildDuckFantasy, Duret168, OxygenProton168GS
- nils
- Swoard founder
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Friday 22 March 2002, 19:22
- Location: Lyon, France - Swoard team
- Contact:
Silber
If you know someone that works at northwave factory > ask them if there are any left ( .900 or .950) and ask for the list!
Also tell them that there is a NEED for new production!
Nils
Also tell them that there is a NEED for new production!
Nils
Already asked to keep me informed...anything that comes out I'll post it. For resuming production I already tried in the past....only for minimum 5000 pair if I recall correctly....
Francesco Swoard (1G175M 3G175M020 e 168H054),Wingergun205,Shaman193,TTubeS1/174GS,F2 (RS183'08 e'06/Lancelot/Slbpfl),Virus (Hurric./Dragon),Pogo (Hardc./Imp.),Burton (FP/Speed/PJ/CustomX),WildDuckFantasy, Duret168, OxygenProton168GS
- nils
- Swoard founder
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Friday 22 March 2002, 19:22
- Location: Lyon, France - Swoard team
- Contact:
5000 total...?
5000 total or by size?
I'm sure 5000 would be easy to sell
500 > 30-31
1000> 28-29
1000>26-27
1000>24-25
1000>22-23
500>21-22
count me in
( although i already have a spare one 
N.
I'm sure 5000 would be easy to sell
500 > 30-31
1000> 28-29
1000>26-27
1000>24-25
1000>22-23
500>21-22
count me in


N.
What the reasonsilber wrote:the owner has modified the spring system reversing the springs in the back boot.

Swoard EC Pro2 168H - Swoard EC12 Boots - Gen5 168H - Stoke 162 M
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Saturday 7 January 2006, 22:26
- Location: OHIO!!! (This is not a joke)
- Contact:
I don't understand. even if the springs were different lengths, if you were using the same 2 springs, it'd be the same height.skywalker wrote:Well I think: Same stiffness, different length. He just wanted to have more forward lean on rear foot (and maybe more ancle support).
my 2 ct
2+3=5 and 3+2=5
Right?
The back boot is already adjusted in a more forward leaning position due to a different bolt on the side of the ankle. Reversing the springs allows same maximum forward and backward lean than the front boot.
Francesco Swoard (1G175M 3G175M020 e 168H054),Wingergun205,Shaman193,TTubeS1/174GS,F2 (RS183'08 e'06/Lancelot/Slbpfl),Virus (Hurric./Dragon),Pogo (Hardc./Imp.),Burton (FP/Speed/PJ/CustomX),WildDuckFantasy, Duret168, OxygenProton168GS
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Saturday 7 January 2006, 22:26
- Location: OHIO!!! (This is not a joke)
- Contact:
Ahh, you are correct! Very Sorry!skywalker wrote:Sorry, please look at the pic carefully. If The boot adaptor was above both springs, system would be not very useful (only having backward lean spring).
So height of boot connector an thus forward lean angle is defined by length of lower spring.
skywalker