Support about extremecarving or freecarve/freeride Swoard boards, hardboots and bindings
Moderators: fivat, rilliet, nils
-
fivat
- Swoard & EC founder

- Posts: 3035
- Joined: Thursday 21 March 2002, 13:13
- Location: Geneva, Switzerland
-
Contact:
Post
by fivat » Thursday 27 November 2008, 15:01
Warning! I realized recently that there are some riders who were not positioning their feet correctly on their Swoard.

I'm talking here about the setting for the slopes. In deep powder, some riders prefer to move the feet slightly backwards.
The Swoard is conceived for optimal performances when the feet are centered along to the contact length of the board.
The images below are clearer than long sentences:
The first image is showing a position perfectly centered on the inserts (yellow dots). If one wants to increase or reduce the distance between the bindings, one has to do it correctly as shown on the 2 other images.
I hope that it's clear.
Patrice Fivat
-
starikashka
- Rank 5

- Posts: 963
- Joined: Friday 29 February 2008, 20:07
- Location: Russia
-
Contact:
Post
by starikashka » Thursday 27 November 2008, 21:34
looks clear but somebody will be confused anyway

wrong stance picture is lacking and point of the middle of contact lenght is not shown

i`m learning
-
st3v0
- Rank 4

- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sunday 20 January 2008, 2:38
Post
by st3v0 » Thursday 27 November 2008, 21:41
Clear as the Saas Fee's sky!

-
Tuomas
- Rank 1

- Posts: 5
- Joined: Friday 5 March 2010, 6:04
- Location: Finland
Post
by Tuomas » Tuesday 9 March 2010, 18:00
As 192cm tall guy you would probably recommend useing the picture further on the right? Or is it just matter of style and habbit?
(first swoard (EC) arriving this week)
-
Arnaud
- Administrator

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Friday 24 January 2003, 9:00
- Location: Paris - IdF 95
Post
by Arnaud » Tuesday 9 March 2010, 18:21
Tuomas
Are you talking about stance ? If yes, you can apply the following formula :
Height / 3.55
In your case 192 / 3.55 = 54 cm Stance.
Swoard EC Pro2 168H - Swoard EC12 Boots - Gen5 168H - Stoke 162 M
-
Tuomas
- Rank 1

- Posts: 5
- Joined: Friday 5 March 2010, 6:04
- Location: Finland
Post
by Tuomas » Tuesday 9 March 2010, 18:22
Thanks mate!
-
pokkis
- Rank 5

- Posts: 1804
- Joined: Monday 1 April 2002, 19:46
- Location: Finland
Post
by pokkis » Tuesday 9 March 2010, 18:34
Arnould, as you know that formula forks only for some folks, as any of formulas to define stance al any other parameter
All depends of persons own dimenssions and joints and flexibility

-
Arnaud
- Administrator

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Friday 24 January 2003, 9:00
- Location: Paris - IdF 95
Post
by Arnaud » Tuesday 9 March 2010, 19:51
Pokkis, you're right. This is a basic rules to set the first value. Then you have to make adjustments to find the best setting for you.
Swoard EC Pro2 168H - Swoard EC12 Boots - Gen5 168H - Stoke 162 M
-
Wouter
- Rank 4

- Posts: 98
- Joined: Tuesday 11 January 2011, 23:22
- Location: Madrid
Post
by Wouter » Wednesday 28 December 2011, 11:16
Hi,
just a quick and probably stupid

question:
How do you measure the distance between the feet? The distance from the middle of the bindings?
Just double checking.
Cheers.
Wouter
Swoard 168M Pro2
Oxess 164 Titanium
Volkl 175 Skwal
F2 Respect
-
joemzl
- Moderator

- Posts: 1405
- Joined: Tuesday 5 September 2006, 20:29
- Location: where Varus died in Germany // above you see, why I came to snowboarding: the Vitelli Turn
Post
by joemzl » Wednesday 28 December 2011, 11:23
Yes
-
Wouter
- Rank 4

- Posts: 98
- Joined: Tuesday 11 January 2011, 23:22
- Location: Madrid
Post
by Wouter » Wednesday 28 December 2011, 11:29
Cool.

I thought so and have been doing (unconsciously) so during the last 18 years.....
Cheers.
WL
Swoard 168M Pro2
Oxess 164 Titanium
Volkl 175 Skwal
F2 Respect