RIP my Swoard Gen2...

Support about extremecarving or freecarve/freeride Swoard boards, hardboots and bindings

Moderators: fivat, rilliet, nils

Locked
User avatar
Lee
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 53
Joined: Friday 26 December 2003, 17:25
Location: Netherlands

RIP my Swoard Gen2...

Post by Lee » Monday 3 May 2010, 16:31

I broke my swoard (serial 168) landed a bit on the tail after a stupid jump
Image
Image

I will order a new one asap... Do i get a refund?

User avatar
Transistor Rhythm
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 302
Joined: Monday 10 March 2008, 9:46
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Post by Transistor Rhythm » Monday 3 May 2010, 21:19

I think you forgot a :P , :wink: or :lol: in the last sentence, this board is already a few years old ;) (or did you mean partial refund?)

Same has happened to me once, but still the board was repairable because there was no actual breakage only delam. This looks pretty hopeless to me. Did you also use F2 intecs on the board?

But look at the bright side: you have a very good excuse to come to the next ECS 8)
Fridgecarver

User avatar
fivat
Swoard & EC founder
Swoard & EC founder
Posts: 3010
Joined: Thursday 21 March 2002, 13:13
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: RIP my Swoard Gen2...

Post by fivat » Tuesday 4 May 2010, 10:51

Damn, what a breakage! 8O RIP ! The only board I managed to break like this was a prototype hand made by Jacques in the nineties, and it was in a jump too.

Lee, since you are the owner of this old generation 2, we make you -10% rebate for fidelity (as written on the Web site), though your purchase was made 4-5 years ago! There is no time limit. 8) This is available on the very last boards, generation 3 "extended".

Purchases are possible during the summer. So you would be ready for the next season. :D In the comments part of the order form, please mention the fidelity rebate and the serial number of your preceding board. Thanks!

Patrice Fivat

User avatar
Lee
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 53
Joined: Friday 26 December 2003, 17:25
Location: Netherlands

Post by Lee » Wednesday 5 May 2010, 19:56

Yes, i use F2 Intec bindings...

Thanks Fivat! You will receive my order this summer.
I want all to know that the swoard is one of my favorite boards in Carving and comfort in all snow conditions so i really need a replacement.

User avatar
joemzl
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1399
Joined: Tuesday 5 September 2006, 20:29
Location: where Varus died in Germany // above you see, why I came to snowboarding: the Vitelli Turn

Post by joemzl » Thursday 6 May 2010, 11:14

Perhaps you should change your bindings too? :think:
Extreme Dreamer every night

Swoard Pro 175M +Race Ti Flex, Plasma CE185/17, Swoard Stoke 162M

User avatar
pokkis
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 1804
Joined: Monday 1 April 2002, 19:46
Location: Finland

Post by pokkis » Thursday 6 May 2010, 12:06

Do you expect that they were broken too? :wink:

User avatar
Lee
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 53
Joined: Friday 26 December 2003, 17:25
Location: Netherlands

Post by Lee » Wednesday 12 May 2010, 7:35

I heard indeed that the Intec binding could be a reason that a board can break due to it stiffness.. I don't think that when i had a normal F2 Ti binding that the board would stay in one piece.

I'll stay with my intec bindings... for now :wink:

User avatar
crack676
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 166
Joined: Tuesday 25 March 2008, 21:15
Location: Bern, Switzerland

Post by crack676 » Wednesday 12 May 2010, 7:44

Have you ever tried classic bindings on your swoard? The performance is way better than with intec's. I prefer intec's only on narrower boards, smaller than 20cm in the middle.
Coiler NSR 189 16.5 & 189 20.5, Kessler WC 185, V- Asy 186
Intec Titanium; Deeluxe T 700 BTS

User avatar
starikashka
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 963
Joined: Friday 29 February 2008, 20:07
Location: Russia
Contact:

Post by starikashka » Wednesday 12 May 2010, 9:54

crack676 wrote:Have you ever tried classic bindings on your swoard? The performance is way better than with intec's. I prefer intec's only on narrower boards, smaller than 20cm in the middle.
This is really personal preference issue :-) Some people see advantages of regular bindings, some people - do not :-) I do not know why it`s different :-)
i`m learning

User avatar
István
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 899
Joined: Monday 29 September 2003, 13:04
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Post by István » Wednesday 12 May 2010, 10:01

It's all about the lateral flex. At lower angles a flexible / lose binding will be supportive to your riding, while at higher angles it will be rather counter productive. Just think about it.

User avatar
crack676
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 166
Joined: Tuesday 25 March 2008, 21:15
Location: Bern, Switzerland

Post by crack676 » Wednesday 12 May 2010, 12:25

István wrote:It's all about the lateral flex. At lower angles a flexible / lose binding will be supportive to your riding, while at higher angles it will be rather counter productive. Just think about it.
Exactly. But of course, anyone can use what he wants. Like me, I used Titanflex for about 2 years, untill i recognized that classic bindings are (for me) way better on wider boards.
Coiler NSR 189 16.5 & 189 20.5, Kessler WC 185, V- Asy 186
Intec Titanium; Deeluxe T 700 BTS

User avatar
István
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 899
Joined: Monday 29 September 2003, 13:04
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Post by István » Wednesday 12 May 2010, 16:18

I think the way forward in the progression of bindings with good lateral flex is something like the TD3 Sidewinder. To me that engineered flex looks more trustable than riding an old burton race plate that can explode any moment....

But that is just me, I know that even pro riders ride those old and lousy bindings, I know that Jacques and Patrice don't even tighten up their bindings just to have more flex, etc.

User avatar
fivat
Swoard & EC founder
Swoard & EC founder
Posts: 3010
Joined: Thursday 21 March 2002, 13:13
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Contact:

Post by fivat » Monday 17 May 2010, 15:34

István wrote:I know that Jacques and Patrice don't even tighten up their bindings just to have more flex, etc.
No, I have always tightened up my F2 bindings normally (as I did with all my other bindings). Jacques too, except with his old TD2 and, especially, the TD1: the rumor started from this I guess (see the old feedback in 2004 comparing TD2 and TD1). The TD3 and any other good bindings for extremecarving should not be too loose... for safety reasons.

Note that the new bails on the F2 Race Titanium are thicker and make the bindings stiffer. :-( I don't want to use them for this reason. Some riders even broke their Head hardboots with them. 8O

Patrice Fivat

User avatar
Lee
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 53
Joined: Friday 26 December 2003, 17:25
Location: Netherlands

Post by Lee » Sunday 23 May 2010, 9:58

I only use the intec binding for it conveinient step-in system. I'm a lazy person :wink:

Locked