Swoard size and flex ?

Support about extremecarving or freecarve/freeride Swoard boards, hardboots and bindings

Moderators: fivat, rilliet, nils

Locked
User avatar
ziploader
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 69
Joined: Friday 18 December 2009, 16:36
Location: Bern/Schweiz

Swoard size and flex ?

Post by ziploader » Saturday 9 January 2010, 19:40

I am 175cm hight and a weight of 85kg.
I board since 10 Years with Hardboots an want to learn EC.
Bootlengh is 32cm. (MP 27) 8O
At the selection-side I come to 175 H.
Which bingingsangel is there the best ? 50/55 ?
And which stance do I choose ?
cu

Marcus

User avatar
Arnaud
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 3279
Joined: Friday 24 January 2003, 9:00
Location: Paris - IdF 95

size / flex choice

Post by Arnaud » Saturday 9 January 2010, 20:20

175 cm / 85 kg / Mondo 27 = 168 Hard !
Angles 45-47 R / 53-55 F
stance = 49 cm
Swoard EC Pro2 168H - Swoard EC12 Boots - Gen5 168H - Stoke 162 M

User avatar
Hans
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 933
Joined: Wednesday 19 March 2003, 21:17

Post by Hans » Saturday 9 January 2010, 21:28

Have had the same board, I am a heavier rider and I was 180 then.
Same mondo.

User avatar
ziploader
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 69
Joined: Friday 18 December 2009, 16:36
Location: Bern/Schweiz

Post by ziploader » Monday 11 January 2010, 10:02

But If I messure the bootlenght (32cm) an show at the selection-table, the result ist 175 ?

See there: https://www.extremecarving.com/swoard/choose.html

Also, in my opinion the 168 H would be the right length.

Thanks.
cu

Marcus

User avatar
Hans
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 933
Joined: Wednesday 19 March 2003, 21:17

Post by Hans » Monday 11 January 2010, 10:11

ziploader wrote:But If I messure the bootlenght (32cm) an show at the selection-table, the result ist 175 ?

See there: https://www.extremecarving.com/swoard/choose.html

Also, in my opinion the 168 H would be the right length.

Thanks.
Did measure the same but they adivsed me to take the 168 Hard. Have had some fun with the board.

truciolo
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 37
Joined: Monday 11 January 2010, 9:33
Location: savona, italy

Post by truciolo » Tuesday 26 January 2010, 12:27

hi, there's something i don't understand as well in the table 1 for the sword lenght selection.. here you say your boots are 32cm long.

if my feet size is 43 and my boots are 30.7cm long, how can it be possible that jacques rillet has feet size 45 and boots lenght 29.5cm?

User avatar
István
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 899
Joined: Monday 29 September 2003, 13:04
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Post by István » Tuesday 26 January 2010, 14:00

Northwave boots are generally smaller... and he might also have had some special bootfitting to squeeze his feet into a 1 size smaller shell...

User avatar
starikashka
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 963
Joined: Friday 29 February 2008, 20:07
Location: Russia
Contact:

Post by starikashka » Tuesday 26 January 2010, 15:21

truciolo wrote:hi, there's something i don't understand as well in the table 1 for the sword lenght selection.. here you say your boots are 32cm long.

if my feet size is 43 and my boots are 30.7cm long, how can it be possible that jacques rillet has feet size 45 and boots lenght 29.5cm?
despite the fact that Jacques have northvawes i can have a bet for something that my Suzuka boots that comfortably place 290 mm feet are smaller than anyone on that forum who have same feet and same boots :-)

P.S. the shell is for 270MP size :-) just in case somebody have more cruel fetters :-)

BTW - UPZ boots are at least 1 cm less than Deeluxe of same size
i`m learning

truciolo
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 37
Joined: Monday 11 January 2010, 9:33
Location: savona, italy

Post by truciolo » Tuesday 26 January 2010, 18:38

ok i could imagine that there could have been some lenght difference beetwen same sized boots of different makers but not this much!!

anyway just to let you know, I own deeluxe le mans 43 and now i can say they're f*****g huge for that size! (30.7cm)

Locked