longer boards?
Moderators: fivat, rilliet, Arnaud, nils
- Jack Michaud
- Rank 3
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Wednesday 11 February 2004, 22:43
- Location: Portland, Maine, USA
longer boards?
Question for the EC guys - have you tried any boards longer than your Swoard 175? I see the 175 has a 13-something meter radius. That sounds like a great design for a 175 (I am baffled by people putting 11m radius on a 179), but have you ever tried something like a 185 with a 15 or 16m radius? I'm riding a 186/15m board and I absolutely love it for laying out carves at high speed on steeps. I'm sure my board would rip on that great looking trail in Opus 3: Stoked.
I remember when I went from a 175 to my 186, I was stunned at how much more stable and chatter-free the 186 was. I was also surprised at how versitile it was, and that it would actually crank some pretty tight carves. However my 175 was an 11.5m radius, which I realize now is too short for that board.
-Jack
I remember when I went from a 175 to my 186, I was stunned at how much more stable and chatter-free the 186 was. I was also surprised at how versitile it was, and that it would actually crank some pretty tight carves. However my 175 was an 11.5m radius, which I realize now is too short for that board.
-Jack
Jack
- rilliet
- Swoard & EC founder
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Tuesday 26 March 2002, 10:39
- Location: Lausanne, Switzerland
- Contact:
Hi Jack,
Years ago I wanted see how would ride a bord with a very big radius, So I made a 175 prototype with a 26m radius!!! The riding was awful. It was impossible to turn without skidding. Even riding strait with the board flat on the snow was very difficult, like riding a bicycle where couldn't turn the handlebars. We don't really notice it but our sidecuts make some auto-correction even when going strait down.
When I was developing the board that became the SWOARD you know, I made a 185 with a 14m radius. This board was great and very stable in big turns. It could also make quite easy short turns, but I found that the 175cm/13m was a better compromise for me and for the kind of piste I was riding. But perhaps today I would feel it differently.
Jacques
Years ago I wanted see how would ride a bord with a very big radius, So I made a 175 prototype with a 26m radius!!! The riding was awful. It was impossible to turn without skidding. Even riding strait with the board flat on the snow was very difficult, like riding a bicycle where couldn't turn the handlebars. We don't really notice it but our sidecuts make some auto-correction even when going strait down.
When I was developing the board that became the SWOARD you know, I made a 185 with a 14m radius. This board was great and very stable in big turns. It could also make quite easy short turns, but I found that the 175cm/13m was a better compromise for me and for the kind of piste I was riding. But perhaps today I would feel it differently.
Jacques
I ride a 180 with a 14m radius which is a combination I really like. In Zinal I tried the 185 Donek from Pokkis, which has an 11m radius I think. The board does not do what you would expect of a 185, you should treat it as a long slalom board rather than a 185. From that point of view it actually had some nice advantages. It really keeps a lot of speed in short hard carved turns, it does not dig in as a slalom board might do in not so hard snow. On the steeper sections I did not like the board so much. It did not seem comfortable with the turns it had to make and got a bit chattery (Keep in mind that I have not ridden a slalom board in a long time). For me it was a fun toy rather than my first choise board.
I am planning to make a board with a bigger radius, 16m or 17m, for next year. I don't feel the 14m I am using now is anywhere near the limit of a comfortable ride, so I am curious how it will work out. I will bring the board to zinal next year, so everyone can try.
Tim
I am planning to make a board with a bigger radius, 16m or 17m, for next year. I don't feel the 14m I am using now is anywhere near the limit of a comfortable ride, so I am curious how it will work out. I will bring the board to zinal next year, so everyone can try.
Tim
- Jack Michaud
- Rank 3
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Wednesday 11 February 2004, 22:43
- Location: Portland, Maine, USA
- nils
- Swoard founder
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Friday 22 March 2002, 19:22
- Location: Lyon, France - Swoard team
- Contact:
Jack :) you'll be able to try at the ECES!
Fin should bring three 175 with different flexes there !
So if you're not a midget they should be fitting you!
the 175cm size is intended for riders above 180cm (6') but I guess anyone over 157cm would have fun on it...
As for flexes and weight, do choose the flex according to the following charts:
-175H > over 84 kilos
-175M> between 74 till 86 kilos
-175S> under 76 kilos
Hope you can try!
Nils
ps: did u get a hold of JNerva?
So if you're not a midget they should be fitting you!
the 175cm size is intended for riders above 180cm (6') but I guess anyone over 157cm would have fun on it...
As for flexes and weight, do choose the flex according to the following charts:
-175H > over 84 kilos
-175M> between 74 till 86 kilos
-175S> under 76 kilos
Hope you can try!
Nils
ps: did u get a hold of JNerva?
- fivat
- Swoard & EC founder
- Posts: 3035
- Joined: Thursday 21 March 2002, 13:13
- Location: Geneva, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Jack :) you'll be able to try at the ECES!
Important: people who are used to high bindings angles on their narrow board should reduce their angles on a Swoard so that toes and heels or close to the edges. If they are too far away, it's bad because one looses the advantages given by a wide board, efforts are too high and the edge change is of course too slownils wrote:the 175cm size is intended for riders above 180cm (6') but I guess anyone over 157cm would have fun on it...

Patrice Fivat
- Jack Michaud
- Rank 3
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Wednesday 11 February 2004, 22:43
- Location: Portland, Maine, USA
Re: Jack :) you'll be able to try at the ECES!
agreed, that's how I set up all my boards - toes and heels on the edge!fivat wrote:Important: people who are used to high bindings angles on their narrow board should reduce their angles on a Swoard so that toes and heels or close to the edges. If they are too far away, it's bad because one looses the advantages given by a wide board, efforts are too high and the edge change is of course too slow
Patrice Fivat
And are those weight ranges with riding gear? Or birthday suit?
Nils, get me Bauer!
Jack
- nils
- Swoard founder
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Friday 22 March 2002, 19:22
- Location: Lyon, France - Swoard team
- Contact:
birthday suit :)
PB will be an extra 1000 bucks!
hehe
I'll see what I can do! but has Jean answered anything? because he is the link to peter!
Nils
hehe
I'll see what I can do! but has Jean answered anything? because he is the link to peter!
Nils