Catek Freeride Pro
Moderators: fivat, rilliet, Arnaud, nils
Catek Freeride Pro
Hi there!
Did somebody try the Catek Freeride (pro) ?
http://www.catek.com/freeride.htm
I need new "Soft" bindings (since i cannot walk with hardboots ... Yahhh it hurts!).
Catek bindings look like a very good stuff and they use Nidecker Carbon 900 Straps (also very good stuff!).
Then, i'm looking for information according to:
- weigth
- precision
- comfort
- flexibility/rigidity
- european dealers
Thx,
Benn
Did somebody try the Catek Freeride (pro) ?
http://www.catek.com/freeride.htm
I need new "Soft" bindings (since i cannot walk with hardboots ... Yahhh it hurts!).
Catek bindings look like a very good stuff and they use Nidecker Carbon 900 Straps (also very good stuff!).
Then, i'm looking for information according to:
- weigth
- precision
- comfort
- flexibility/rigidity
- european dealers
Thx,
Benn
Re: Catek Freeride Pro
- weight: They are lighter than they look. Whe you first see them and see all the metal everyone says they must be heavy. I think you could compare them to any standard construction binding in terms of weight. Carbon fiber bindings may be lighter but I don't think you would really notice unless you had a really light board AND light boots and you're doing a lot of jumping.
- precision: I assume this has to do with fit? Excellent. The only think you have to be careful with is if your boot heels fit snugly into the heel cup. I have Malamutes and they fit great in the binding. Some have argued that they like a fitted base plate that a plastic base plate allows but I don't see it as a problem unless the heel doesn't fit.
- comfort: With the Nidecker 900 straps they are very comfortable.
- flexibility/rigidity: VERY rigid. It's interesting to have the adjustability available for a soft boot binding. It might be a bit of overkill but it's fun to play with.
- european dealers: Can't say but easily order through Catek here in the US.
The reason I got them is that you can keep the mounting plate on the board and swap out Olympic bindings (hardboots) with the Freerides (soft boots) with one large bolt and a little fiddlling with four set screws. Very convenient when you want to ride with hard boots in the morning and softies in the PM or the other way around...
- precision: I assume this has to do with fit? Excellent. The only think you have to be careful with is if your boot heels fit snugly into the heel cup. I have Malamutes and they fit great in the binding. Some have argued that they like a fitted base plate that a plastic base plate allows but I don't see it as a problem unless the heel doesn't fit.
- comfort: With the Nidecker 900 straps they are very comfortable.
- flexibility/rigidity: VERY rigid. It's interesting to have the adjustability available for a soft boot binding. It might be a bit of overkill but it's fun to play with.
- european dealers: Can't say but easily order through Catek here in the US.
The reason I got them is that you can keep the mounting plate on the board and swap out Olympic bindings (hardboots) with the Freerides (soft boots) with one large bolt and a little fiddlling with four set screws. Very convenient when you want to ride with hard boots in the morning and softies in the PM or the other way around...
- nils
- Swoard founder
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Friday 22 March 2002, 19:22
- Location: Lyon, France - Swoard team
- Contact:
sounds interesting :)
If google stocks keep going up i think i'll get both to try 
N.

N.
and Phiokka ?
- 168XH Pro - Custom Dual 168H - Swallow Undertakeur 185
-- Tignes 19 au 25 mars --
-- Tignes 19 au 25 mars --
Re: Catek Freeride Pro
I just prefer light bindings!kelvin o wrote:- weight: They are lighter than they look. Whe you first see them and see all the metal everyone says they must be heavy. I think you could compare them to any standard construction binding in terms of weight. Carbon fiber bindings may be lighter but I don't think you would really notice unless you had a really light board AND light boots and you're doing a lot of jumping.

I'm a little bit worry about "high" is the heel cup.kelvin o wrote:- precision: I assume this has to do with fit? Excellent. The only think you have to be careful with is if your boot heels fit snugly into the heel cup. I have Malamutes and they fit great in the binding. Some have argued that they like a fitted base plate that a plastic base plate allows but I don't see it as a problem unless the heel doesn't fit.
To me, it looks like the back roll bar will constraint the boot above the Heel hard part. do you confirm?
Is it also an issue when you're talking about the way it fits ?
For sure, Nidecker Carbon 900 are excellent!kelvin o wrote:- comfort: With the Nidecker 900 straps they are very comfortable.
What about the base plate comfort? Is there any bumper or pads?
Very interesting.kelvin o wrote:- flexibility/rigidity: VERY rigid. It's interesting to have the adjustability available for a soft boot binding. It might be a bit of overkill but it's fun to play with.
I would love a local dealer to see how it looks!kelvin o wrote:- european dealers: Can't say but easily order through Catek here in the US.

Very very interesting !kelvin o wrote:The reason I got them is that you can keep the mounting plate on the board and swap out Olympic bindings (hardboots) with the Freerides (soft boots) with one large bolt and a little fiddlling with four set screws. Very convenient when you want to ride with hard boots in the morning and softies in the PM or the other way around...

A note about swapping the Freerides and Olympics... This only works with the original Olympics (not the OS2). The Freerides and the OS2s' baseplates are NOT compatible so if you want to do the swapping thing you have to get the original OS's or wait until the Freerides get the same baseplate treatment as the OS2's (a question that you might post over on the Catek forum if it hasn't been done already).
I'm not exactly sure what your question is but from what I've understood, I've heard that some boot heels are too wide so don't actually fit into the heel cup or too narrow so have too much movement in the heel. I haven't heard anything about the heel cup being too high though. Again my Salomon Malamutes fit perfectly and Sean Martin of Donek fame uses Deeluxe soft boots with his Freerides (info from the Donek website).Benn wrote:I'm a little bit worry about "high" is the heel cup.
To me, it looks like the back roll bar will constraint the boot above the Heel hard part. do you confirm?
Is it also an issue when you're talking about the way it fits ?
The base plate is just a flat aluminum plate, no forming, no padding, no nothing, just metal. This has been one criticism of the system that there is no damping system. I think this is fine for soft boot carving where the boots do a lot of the damping anyway but for freestyle and landing big airs on hard snow it might be too stiff (this is just a guess since I almost exclusively stay on the ground except for a few carving type, longer than higher, airs). I would think it would be very easy to add a neoprene pad to the base plate but his would depend on your boots, your insoles and your preferences.Benn wrote:What about the base plate comfort? Is there any bumper or pads?
I did not see it.
I read it on the forum:
http://www.catek.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=19
GS said: "You can use the old style disc, but you have to purchase the conversion kit for the kingpin. It converts the 12mm kingpin to a 10mm one. It's available for around $20 here on this web site."
I read it on the forum:
http://www.catek.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=19
GS said: "You can use the old style disc, but you have to purchase the conversion kit for the kingpin. It converts the 12mm kingpin to a 10mm one. It's available for around $20 here on this web site."
I believe the "older discs" that they're refering to is the old style World Cup bindings which had a smaller sized king pin. I looked again and found the following regarding Olympic/Freeride compatibility with the OS2's...
http://www.catek.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=112

http://www.catek.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=112
Bummer, looks like we're going to have to wait a bit more for the freeride to catch up.Can riders with older Cateks upgrade to the OS2 PowerPlate?
Will the top plates (long, short, freeride) of the OS1 and Freeride bindings fit onto the new OS2 power plate?
Those are kind of the same question, and the answer is no. The under-side of the OS2 top plate (long & short) has been extensively machined to interface with the OS2 Power Plate.
(The OS1 and Freeride plates would sit WAY above standard ride height in order to clear the ribs on the Power Plate. So high in fact that the tilt screws and kingpin wouldn't be able to engage.)
Regards,
swt

Donek Incline 160, Catek Freerides,
O-Sin 4807 168, F2 Proflex Titanflex,
Raichle 224's (lots of mods)
O-Sin 4807 168, F2 Proflex Titanflex,
Raichle 224's (lots of mods)
Now, i understand.kelvin o wrote:I believe the "older discs" that they're refering to is the old style World Cup bindings which had a smaller sized king pin. I looked again and found the following regarding Olympic/Freeride compatibility with the OS2's...
Thx for the explanation.
Agree with you.kelvin o wrote:Bummer, looks like we're going to have to wait a bit more for the freeride to catch up.
Let's claim new Freeride Pro bindings for next year or sooner!!
