Why Not Alpine Touring Boots??

Various topics, technical questions, announcements, events, resorts, ...

Moderators: fivat, rilliet, Arnaud, nils

Locked
SidiasX
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 5
Joined: Wednesday 24 December 2003, 17:18

Why Not Alpine Touring Boots??

Post by SidiasX » Sunday 1 May 2005, 21:15

http://www.backcountry.com/store/GAR003 ... -Boot.html

Would something like this work? If so why are they not used??
There seams to be a much larger selection of Alpine touring boots than hard boots designed for snowboarding.

User avatar
Felix
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 669
Joined: Thursday 30 October 2003, 20:14
Location: Austria, but moedling near vienna, bloody 1 hour drive to semmering or rax
Contact:

Post by Felix » Monday 2 May 2005, 19:06

forget it.
1. Not enough forward lean
2. too long sole a value of 270mm for Euro Size 42 (9US?)shoes would be a good value, if it maches well maybe usable, but again not enough forward lean.

User avatar
Rob Stevens
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 42
Joined: Friday 25 February 2005, 23:22
Location: Banff, CANADA

Ice climbing boots

Post by Rob Stevens » Tuesday 11 October 2005, 22:37

Hi;
When I started riding in '84, the only boots available were limp-wristed Sorels (a Canadian brand). Since this "snow-shovelling" boot had no support at all, save for an optional, added ski boot liner, I decided to use a plastic-shelled Koflach "Hunter", an ice climbing boot. After a few years, Koflach came out with a boot known as the "Superpipe". This was a "Hunter" with a higher ankle cuff and hideous colours.
No one bought into it at the time (save me and anyone I could get to try them. I owned 4 pairs myself) and the boot dissappeared as if it had never existed.
It was really a shame. The ankle mobility was good and the Vibram sole gave amazing support and edge control, with no cramped, bent arches. The type of edge control possible was far superior to what others were getting in a time long before baseplates with toe and heel ramps. You could also bevel the heel and toe off the boot, giving a size 10(U.S.) the same sole length as an 8. With no overhang, you could easily E/C on the toeside edge.
Around the same time, Jose Fernandez and, later, Damian Sanders were using a buckled version. I didn't really like it as I felt it was too stiff in the ankle and not a good "soft boot".
So you don't have to go looking for any old Koflachs, Burton (everything old is new again) now has a Vibram-soled boot. I think it's the "Driver". While you may not be able to shorten the sole length like on the Koflach, the stiff sole will keep your feet from fatiguing on those long-ass Euro traverses I see at your resorts.
Lates.
P.S. Don't even think about buying a pair of "mixed" climbing boots. They're shit for this application. I would say, however, that if you can find a pair of "Superpipe" Koflachs in your size, pick them up. If your foot is the right shape for them (though they're moldable) you'll probably like them alot.

MarkN
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 24
Joined: Tuesday 15 March 2005, 2:09
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by MarkN » Tuesday 18 October 2005, 19:55

What about the old Nordica SBH boots? I think they are for split-boarding or backcountry.

They are pretty soft -- would they work for EC?

(wish I could get some mondo 26 Northwaves!!!)
EC Dreamer

User avatar
Rob Stevens
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 42
Joined: Friday 25 February 2005, 23:22
Location: Banff, CANADA

soft hardboots

Post by Rob Stevens » Tuesday 18 October 2005, 22:56

I know the Nordicas you're talking about.
If you wanted a "hardboot' for pow, that would be the one. They're probably a bit soft for hardpack, though.
The Koflachs I spoke of were lace-ups.

Locked