Virus binding - did anybody test them?

Various topics, technical questions, announcements, events, resorts, ...

Moderators: fivat, rilliet, Arnaud, nils

User avatar
McFussel
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 531
Joined: Saturday 23 March 2002, 13:03
Location: Benztown-Baby....

Post by McFussel » Monday 13 February 2006, 17:40

Roman is right....I´m riding thins binding now since 3 years...It is excellent!

:roll:
Don´t ride the chicken line!

http://www.carving-masters.de
Image

User avatar
cmachine
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 163
Joined: Sunday 3 November 2002, 20:16
Location: Winterthur, Switzerland
Contact:

Post by cmachine » Monday 13 February 2006, 18:55

roman wrote:as the 'shaper' of this tested binding said to me, a board has to be bended to ride a 1m (!) radius. so there should be no problem with
I see. I did not understand the concept:
I thought that it was the intention that the board fully touches the binding if flexed stronger.

But it is not. ok :-)

Olaf

User avatar
McFussel
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 531
Joined: Saturday 23 March 2002, 13:03
Location: Benztown-Baby....

Post by McFussel » Tuesday 14 February 2006, 8:54

You are nearly right. The idea is to have no hard edge touching the board while it is flexing. This prevents high preassure on the board and in the following breaking the board.
Furthermore it helps the board to have a ongoing flex, because the binding only blocks bending in a small area.... :roll:

But Intec Titanum or Bomber works fin too....

Virus Bindung is very, very stable & durable, no readjusting, fine look... 8)
Don´t ride the chicken line!

http://www.carving-masters.de
Image

Locked